Alright. Let’s talk Supernatural. “Bloodlines”. It aired. Spin-off imminent.
I went into the episode with an open mind, and I came out of it with mixed feelings.
I love the idea of inter-ruling monster families. “The Godfather with fangs”, as Dean colorfully put it. However, the more I watched, the more I couldn’t help but see just another “Vampire Diaries” or “The Originals” or any of the other high-angst series the CW is famous for producing.
I’m getting slightly ahead of myself. The one worry I had going into this week’s Supernatural episode, knowing it was the backdoor pilot, was that the network would make the same mistake almost every spin-off makes: they wouldn’t pinpoint what actually made the original series so popular. Supernatural isn’t about the monsters. It’s not about the action. It’s about two brothers and their shitty, shitty lives, and sticking with them through all their worst moments, watching them fight the good fight, is what fans love about the show. I did not get the impression this was understood in creating “Bloodlines”.
Needless to say, my worries were not allayed by the end of the episode. They started out good. Hunter being born. Remember Uncle Bobby’s message, kids: “Every Hunter starts somewhere”. Ennis has his tragic initiation into the world of Hunting, and off we go. Main character #2 is Shapeshifter David. He’s essentially Andrew Garfield’s Peter Parker. There. Said it. Now try not to see it, if you can. He’s back in town due to his brother’s murder. Sam and Dean show up. They do their FBI thing, tell Ennis to just ignore everything (like that’ll happen), and go off to do their own thing. Ennis and David meet up, and the exposition was…is there a word that means both “bland” and “poorly written”? Ennis explains “I know the bare basics: monsters and Hunters”, so of course David concludes this is foundation enough to reveal the entire secret life of the city to a complete stranger: “Monsters rule everything.” In fact, he goes so far as to explain specifics! Specifics, to a guy he doesn’t even know he’ll meet again! I was a bit disappointed in the writers for not finding a better way to impart this information to the audience. The 2nd half of the episode involves four guys off to rescue a girl who could apparently free herself anytime she really wanted (more on that in a sec). One thing I did approve of was Ennis shooting the bad guy without hestitation. Obviously I’m not advocating violence, but it was rather unique against how stories normally handle such interactions.
Speaking of unique…Ennis’s fiancee dying as a catalyst for this story? Not unique. In fact, while an apparently appropriate beginning for a Hunter, it was still rather cliche. No more so than the Romeo and Juli-werewolf storyline they put into motion between David and Violet, however. Gag. Me. Now. These were the parts that, to me, screamed of CW’s normal fare for series.
It seems Bloodlines intends to follow in Supernatural’s footsteps in terms of how it treats female characters. First we have Margo, basically evil and power hungry. Then we have Violet, powerful but not quite a match for any of the male characters around her. Then we have Tamara, the dead love interest. So essentially all females are again regulated to either strong and evil, good but weak, or dead. I’m none too happy about this. This isn’t just a “Bloodlines” problem. I’m looking at you, too, Supernatural.
The episode ends with Ennis like this:
…and no real persuasive arguments for why this series is worth my time other than its relation to Supernatural.
It seemed potentially interesting, just not terribly impressive. I don’t know. Maybe I just have unrealistically high expectations of backdoor pilots at this point thanks to Arrow, who rocked the SHIT out of their backdoor pilot for Barry Allen.
Your move, Bloodlines. MAKE ME CARE.